Skip to main content

Research into management - it seems British managers, by and large, are useless

My good friends at the CIPD (Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development), that astute body of people who I wouldn't leave in charge of a Happy Meal order at that popular fast food outlet (perhaps they should ask permission to use the clown as their mascot), have come up with some silly season research (a few months early, of course, in pursuit of getting into the May bank holiday media when journalists will seize upon any old drivel to get away from the office early) that suggests British managers are out of touch with their staff and generally deluded about their own worth.

Yes, great stuff from those who are meant to head-up the wild, wacky and totally dysfunctional world of HR.

They went on to say that managers consistently have a more grandiose view of their own effectiveness than do those who work for them.

Well, ten out of ten for stating the blasted obvious, as anyone working on the shop floor, in an office, on a production line, in a shop, call centre or on the minimum wage or slightly above will testify to! And none more so that the Royal Mail, where, if you ask any postie struggling in the rain to complete his/her now over-extended rounds will tell you, his/her sorting office will be knee deep in the useless buggers, hands forever in pockets or drinking tea.

It's all part of the invasive uselessness of HR in this country, which, I know I go on about ad nauseum, but no one seems to do anything about it.

Abysmal recruitment practices are rife, with the overall dishonesty in recruitment advertisements ("My client" when it's plainly not their client, "leading" when all the others say similar, "phishing" activities that lead job seekers on when said agency has not even been employed by the company to recruit on their behalf etc).

Then there's the actual lauding of the HR seniors themselves in companies, totally unjustified, many sitting on senior management teams (often a bunch of equally gormless gnomes, who take a far greater salary than the real workers, all in relation to the value they add to the business - but that's another story) because their prime function seems to be solely as professionally inefficient office administrators who only come into their own when it's a happy-slappy team-building day (ugh!), where they get the opportunity to place coloured squares on the floor for staff to jump up and down on and pretend they are trees.

I speak from practical and quite bitter experience of some of the worst HR practices ever. The three companies in the past I have worked for where there was no HR input whatsoever (rare today), were the best jobs in my career. The managers rolled their sleeves up and threw their lot in when required; they never asked you to do something they weren't prepared to do themselves; they knew what day it was; they were managers who actually added value to the business.

So, perhaps before simply deriding useless management, perhaps ask why they are so useless. And for heaven's sake, only question it if you know you can do better.

Which sadly, is nearly always the case anyway.

It really is time all this Americanised HR drivel was done away with, and genuine, hardworking and respected Personnel Managers were reintroduced. Personnel Managers who shuffle less pieces of paper from in-tray to out-tray. Personnel Managers who know what their staff do. And Personnel Managers who are willing and able to undertake direct recruitment of staff by virtue of the knowledge of their workers' function in the business, rather than simply leave it to the moribund "My clients" and "leaders" brigade.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will