Skip to main content

"Pre-" . . . . . good grief!!!!!!!!!

I was looking through the Guardian this morning and noticed a position being advertised that I thought I'd take a closer look at. The first sentence, when clicking the link to apply was:

"If you are registered, please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you."

What is the current fixation with the prefix "pre". It is everywhere, turning perfectly reasonable statements into total and utter gibberish!

I would have thought that for one of our major quality newspapers, instead of "please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you" it would have been much more sensible to have something along the lines of "please log in and your details will be automatically filled in for you".

It is the rip-off Britain merchants who have embraced this particular prefix with a vengeance. They have nonsensically slapped it in front of the word "order" so that the moment an overpriced games console, war game for that console, phone, pair of designer trainers made in a Vietnamese sweat-shop, etc, is announced as on the way, large shelf-talkers and posters appear enabling the customer to "pre-order".

Oh come off it you total idiots! There is absolutely no such thing as pre-order! You either order something or you don't order something!

Just be honest and say "order now", or perhaps be brave enough to say "order now so we can bank your money and at least make some extra interest, although it's not a lot, safe in the knowledge that we've trapped you into buying our crap knowing full-well that the price will be reduced three weeks after you've taken delivery".

And then there's "pre-book". What? How can you pre-book? Either you book or you don't book. You'll still get charged an unethical, totally dishonest and translucent booking fee no matter what you do! Complete and utter garbage! Pre-book! Whoever thought of this totally stupid and meaningless statement needs to retake a GCSE in English. In grammatically-correct English, "pre-book" translates as "book before you book", which is utter nonsense.

If you've passed by any of the cash converting shops, you know, the ones who pay £40 for a Notebook PC in the grim hope they can sell it for £160. Well, all their goods are now either "pre-owned" or "pre-loved" (pre-loved? what utter and absolute nonsensical garbage is that now?).

Well I've got bad news for them all. Some very bad news in fact. These goods are neither "pre-owned" or "pre-loved"; they are just plain old second-hand or used. End of.

Or stolen, in the case of those shops located in the more dubious suburbs.

Right, I've just "pre-sh*tted" (that's "broken wind" in the "pre" brigade's language) prior to "pre-driving" (picking up my car keys from the table) and "pre-shopping" (putting my wallet in my pocket) in order to "pre-eat" (go supermarket food shopping).

Pah!

P.S. Hot off the internet - May 2018 - 1&1 the web hosting company have eclipsed everyone with this load of horse****: "Pre-reserve new domain extensions" PRE-RESERVE???????????

Heaven help us all as the English language goes even further to hell in a hand cart in the cause of desperate marketing.

Comments

  1. I got Robert to pre read this for me Ed.
    Saved me a load of time...
    LOL

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will