Skip to main content

Pssst! Can I tell you something . . . . . . . . . .?

I would love (and I know it will never happen) for just one conspiracy theorist somewhere in the world to prove just one, or even half of one of their claims. My local Professor Conspiracy dropped in for a coffee and has some new theories she is convinced of.

1. The internet is just out there in the sky and is free. We should not be paying for it. Yes, Sir Tim Berners-Lee indeed wanted it to be free, which depending on what you use it for (ie avoiding data hoovers), it can be sort of free. However, I cannot get Professor Conspiracy to understand that the "free" internet cannot be brought into your house without charge for the infrastructure and technology that enables it via the providers. I asked her why then does she not drop her internet provider and just go get it for free herself. Her reply. "But you need to pay someone to bring it into your house. All the wiring and that."

In effect, she is arguing with herself.

2. Amazon was never started by Jeff Bezos. It was started by a conglomerate of supermarkets including Tesco and Sainsbury to rig prices and they put Jeff Bezos in as a token chief executive to make it look like it was started by an individual. It is an offshoot of eBay to force out private sellers. She says that the $150billion USD Jeff Bezos is worth is just a lie and a cover-up.

3. She wants to home-school her grandchildren because what the teachers are teaching them is all lies.

Even the most creative of teachers would be very hard-pressed to lie about the content of the recommended curriculum. Shakespeare was a woman? The capital of Belgium is Toytown? Disneyland is a real country? The Beatles never existed? David Attenborough invented dinosaurs to discourage time travel? Cats have their own internet and it's full of pictures of us?

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for a Facebook acquaintance (who incessantly says she is a moralist, philosopher and former law student - she loves David Irving claiming he is entitled to his "opinion", so that says it all really!) to prove her claim that the Guardian won't interview her because it and the world's media are all owned by the CIA. Not for the actual reason that her ideas are totally disingenuous, dangerous, contradictory and generally off-the-scale barn pot.

Sadly the thin line between conspiracy theories and the world some folk inhabit has now disappeared.

I pity poor ChatGPT, Writing io, Wordtune and all the other AI bandwagoning clones as they assimilate information. They don't stand a chance!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Season for all men

Well, we’re used to hearing about the Camping Season , which for Scouts runs from approximately 31st March to 31st October each year, although Graham Norton’s camping season lasts all year. Then there’s the Caravan Season , where Jeremy Clarkson spends six months with extremely high blood pressure as he tries to overtake them on the A38 in an excruciatingly expensive and completely unnecessary car. The Japanese have their Scientific Season, which was a series of sporadic weeks where they slaughtered endangered whales for scientific research, the results of which seem to be a closely guarded world-secret. This season now looks set, thanks to a group of spineless, land-locked countries threatened by the Land of the Rising Scientific Research with paying more for their Nintendos and PlayStations, to last until the final whale is wiped off the face of the oceans. I have written to the Japanese Embassy four times now seeking details of this research (email address info@l...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...

"Pre-" . . . . . good grief!!!!!!!!!

I was looking through the Guardian this morning and noticed a position being advertised that I thought I'd take a closer look at. The first sentence, when clicking the link to apply was: "If you are registered, please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you." What is the current fixation with the prefix "pre" . It is everywhere, turning perfectly reasonable statements into total and utter gibberish! I would have thought that for one of our major quality newspapers, instead of "please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you" it would have been much more sensible to have something along the lines of "please log in and your details will be automatically filled in for you". It is the rip-off Britain merchants who have embraced this particular prefix with a vengeance. They have nonsensically slapped it in front of the word " order " so that the moment an overpriced games console, war game for that console, phone,...