Skip to main content

Brands - ha!

Just finished a dreary marketing zoom meeting (yes, I know, I was in marketing myself for years!) with some disinterested "facilitator" who had such bright teeth implants I had to wear my sunglasses. It was to "garner opinion" on a potential "new" comparison website (yep, another bloody parasitical venture that also asked about the ridiculous test names [a common word spelt incorrectly of course - how creative] and branding that they had come up with). Further than that I can't reveal, otherwise they will find me and they will kill me.



Mr Implanty kept droning on at every opportunity that it is "all about the brand". No Mr Implanty, it's not all about the brand if the product turns out to be utter and total crap. The brand that is Kanye Hitler is a perfect example. Expedia is another example where they play off Trivago against their own other Expedia brands, namely hotels dot con (sic), ebookers and Expedia itself. And if it's just you and a carry-on bag the size of a car First Aid kit, then it's the RyanAir "brand" without the O'Leary extras, and not the vastly superior Lufthansa brand that you fly with to Germany.

He then went on to describe Tesla being the ideal inspirational electric car brand. That it may be, but I pulled him up by mentioning that while Tesla was the most-owned electric car brand, its models are among the least reliable, with Kia being the most reliable. He had no answer when I asked what the point was in owning the most unreliable "brand", when a perceived less desirable brand is not only more reliable but cheaper as well! I also suggested he Google "Tesla in Canada" to see precisely how his brand nonsense stands up in court.

I naughtily checked Glass Door, and this marketing director facilitator is on £190,00 a year. Not bad for a professional total bullsh*tter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...