Skip to main content

Another string to the rip-off Britain bow . . .

We all detest booking fees. Or at least I certainly do. Those hidden extras which totally negate the "from £9.99" ticket price that is written extremely large while the "plus booking fee" needs a microscope to be seen.  The instant translucent coating painted over the so-called  transparent price-ticket.

There is the straightforward daylight robbery fee that the wonderful concert ticket agencies place on their tickets, as if the profit from exclusively filling an arena with 15,000 ticket-payers nine-months prior to the event is not enough.  One single event from a nationwide series of concerts producing in excess of £100,000. £1million in profit from fees for a series of just 10 major venues.And that's before their profit from the tickets themselves. And in the days before the internet, the venues had to put in a much greater effort to sell their tickets. All without booking fees.

Of course, sheer greed and the ability to get away with it legally, is the real explanation.

Then there's the budget airlines. They find all manner of ways to ensure they charge you at least £8, or even a percentage of the full ticket price, for the mere £1 the bank charges them for you using your credit card.

And Megabus with their "From £1 + 50p booking fee" plastered all over the back of their coaches. Don't  the marketing dimwits running the company marketing department realise that "From £1.50" is a far better and more honest proposition for the public?

The latest wheeze comes care of those wonderful people we all know and love. Estate rental agents. While the property aggregation sites, with their stupid names sounding like menageries or house-builders, proudly shout that they will sell your house for a fee that can "save you the price of a new kitchen",  their rental divisions are truly putting the "rip-off" into "rip-off Britain.

A recent wheeze is to charge £60 for a new annual contract for a property rental agreement. Yes, £60 to print out an identical contract to that of the previous year,  just with the new year copied and pasted in. Takes about three minutes? That's £1,200 an hour. Even slightly more than non-medical managers in the NHS earn. Or barristers. And even a little more than the annual lottery-winner that is the Chief Executive of the British national lottery earns.

This is disgusting. Immoral. And daylight robbery. And a thundering disgrace. It's the FIFA equivalent of the property world. It's nothing short of an organised crime racket. Every time you renew your rental contract, you are ostensibly helping award the rental world's World Cup to Qatar. There are a whole bunch of estate agents being run by the equivalent of crooked FIFA officials.

I, for one, think it's time this racket ends.

I'm not to sure what you think. But I'm fairly confident you are as jealous as I am that you can't make a living so easily.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Season for all men

Well, we’re used to hearing about the Camping Season , which for Scouts runs from approximately 31st March to 31st October each year, although Graham Norton’s camping season lasts all year. Then there’s the Caravan Season , where Jeremy Clarkson spends six months with extremely high blood pressure as he tries to overtake them on the A38 in an excruciatingly expensive and completely unnecessary car. The Japanese have their Scientific Season, which was a series of sporadic weeks where they slaughtered endangered whales for scientific research, the results of which seem to be a closely guarded world-secret. This season now looks set, thanks to a group of spineless, land-locked countries threatened by the Land of the Rising Scientific Research with paying more for their Nintendos and PlayStations, to last until the final whale is wiped off the face of the oceans. I have written to the Japanese Embassy four times now seeking details of this research (email address info@l...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...

"Pre-" . . . . . good grief!!!!!!!!!

I was looking through the Guardian this morning and noticed a position being advertised that I thought I'd take a closer look at. The first sentence, when clicking the link to apply was: "If you are registered, please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you." What is the current fixation with the prefix "pre" . It is everywhere, turning perfectly reasonable statements into total and utter gibberish! I would have thought that for one of our major quality newspapers, instead of "please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you" it would have been much more sensible to have something along the lines of "please log in and your details will be automatically filled in for you". It is the rip-off Britain merchants who have embraced this particular prefix with a vengeance. They have nonsensically slapped it in front of the word " order " so that the moment an overpriced games console, war game for that console, phone,...