Skip to main content

Another string to the rip-off Britain bow . . .

We all detest booking fees. Or at least I certainly do. Those hidden extras which totally negate the "from £9.99" ticket price that is written extremely large while the "plus booking fee" needs a microscope to be seen.  The instant translucent coating painted over the so-called  transparent price-ticket.

There is the straightforward daylight robbery fee that the wonderful concert ticket agencies place on their tickets, as if the profit from exclusively filling an arena with 15,000 ticket-payers nine-months prior to the event is not enough.  One single event from a nationwide series of concerts producing in excess of £100,000. £1million in profit from fees for a series of just 10 major venues.And that's before their profit from the tickets themselves. And in the days before the internet, the venues had to put in a much greater effort to sell their tickets. All without booking fees.

Of course, sheer greed and the ability to get away with it legally, is the real explanation.

Then there's the budget airlines. They find all manner of ways to ensure they charge you at least £8, or even a percentage of the full ticket price, for the mere £1 the bank charges them for you using your credit card.

And Megabus with their "From £1 + 50p booking fee" plastered all over the back of their coaches. Don't  the marketing dimwits running the company marketing department realise that "From £1.50" is a far better and more honest proposition for the public?

The latest wheeze comes care of those wonderful people we all know and love. Estate rental agents. While the property aggregation sites, with their stupid names sounding like menageries or house-builders, proudly shout that they will sell your house for a fee that can "save you the price of a new kitchen",  their rental divisions are truly putting the "rip-off" into "rip-off Britain.

A recent wheeze is to charge £60 for a new annual contract for a property rental agreement. Yes, £60 to print out an identical contract to that of the previous year,  just with the new year copied and pasted in. Takes about three minutes? That's £1,200 an hour. Even slightly more than non-medical managers in the NHS earn. Or barristers. And even a little more than the annual lottery-winner that is the Chief Executive of the British national lottery earns.

This is disgusting. Immoral. And daylight robbery. And a thundering disgrace. It's the FIFA equivalent of the property world. It's nothing short of an organised crime racket. Every time you renew your rental contract, you are ostensibly helping award the rental world's World Cup to Qatar. There are a whole bunch of estate agents being run by the equivalent of crooked FIFA officials.

I, for one, think it's time this racket ends.

I'm not to sure what you think. But I'm fairly confident you are as jealous as I am that you can't make a living so easily.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...