Skip to main content

Will you be my friend? Come on ISP's. Get tough!

I appreciate it is nearly always done by "autobots", or whatever the internet nuisances name their little pieces of software, but I notice that the moment you connect to Skype, the social networks, the infuriating MSN Messenger or even the odd five minutes you might while away on one of the free amusement (such as poker) sites, you're hounded by people.

These people are total strangers who want you "to connect with them", "be their poker pal", "have a conversation" or something similar. Total strangers who hound you the second you log on.

Now I know without even accepting these unsolicited spam calls, that were you to agree, you'd be more than likely immediately directed to a Canadian Viagra site, some PPI ambulance-chasing 'para-site' or to one of the less salubrious teenage ninja porn sites. And that, of course, answers the main question as to "What's in it for them?".

However, it doesn't quite answer the question as to why they bother. Yes, if they spam 1 million people, they only need a click-through rate of a minute percentage of one per cent to make money, but I would really love to know why they bother?

More to them point, I cannot understand why the ISP's (internet service providers) aren't more proactive in preventing these spammers. With modern technology and the level of expertise at their disposal, surely it is a simply matter of halting them?

Take Hotmail, the free email account from Microsoft that has been around since 1996 (in Microsoft's hands since 1997). I've had an account since it started, and many of the spam emailers ("Dear Beneficiary", "My friend in Christ" ad nauseam) are also celebrating 15 years of seeking names, addresses, bank account numbers, mothers' maiden names and pin numbers.

The content of these spam emails hasn't changed much over the years. The same old lottery wins from lotteries that you haven't entered and that don't exist. Sons of the Nigerian oil ambassador (he must have thousands of the little blighters) wanting you to put $25million through your account (they always pick such unrealistic sums). Inland Revenue refunds. And the cruel and distasteful former soldiers from Desert Storm or Helmand Province who have found millions of dollars in a sack in the desert that they want to smuggle back to the States (via your account - strange how they can find a bank to deposit the money into in the middle of nowhere!).

It would be so easy for the ISP's to totally block theses spam emails before they even got off the starting blocks! The giveaway is in the wording! Not only the wording, but any email phishing for information by asking name and bank accounts could so easily be blocked. As could any email coming from an obfuscated email address. Although if anyone is dense enough to reply to an email from one email account where when you press the reply button it goes to a different account, and a third "My personal email address" is then contained within the body of the email, they deserve what's coming to them!).

So come on ISP's. Get your fingers out and help eradicate this blight on the internet.

And name registrants! You too could also do with getting your fingers out and banning these para-sites.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will