Skip to main content

Don't undervalue yourself

I never cease to be amazed.

I occasionally peruse (that's "look through" to you, madam) the freelance work job sites, the ones where you can identify a job you think could fill a few spare hours and a few spare holes in what the banks have left behind of your finance.

Several have sprung up over the years, but they all share one thing in common.

Those looking for professional writers seems to be totally clueless in terms of offering a reasonable budget for the job.

I can understand a company in the far east expecting a professional/qualified writer for 80p an hour, because they can otherwise, worst case scenario, find someone locally at 40p an hour who's (sic) English is'nt (sic) quite up to scratch.

However, the number of local, UK businesses and other enterprises, who post jobs for writers at rates  under the minimum wage (and on top of that, a further commission from that below-minimum-wage rate usually has to be paid to the hosting site if you accept the job as a freelance) is staggering.

I noticed last week that a gentleman from Cheshunt, claiming the usual twaddle that they wanted a native English speaker with excellent grammar, because "they were leaders in the field" - [a tractor pulling a plough - that's a leader in a field (see my blog on "leaders")], set the following extra criteria for their potential job bidder:- 10 x 1,000 word articles, must be original; subjects given but research needed; Copyscape checked to ensure originality; copyright handed over; up to two free re-writes to be allowed for each article; preference for a degree-educated writer. And there was a two-day deadline for completion.

So not too demanding, eh!

And the budget?

Well, bearing in mind that when it's warm, and solicitors can actually manage to take their hands out of their clients' pockets for a wee while, they will charge upwards of £300 an hour just for phone calls, photocopying and travel time, as do the likes of the parasitic insolvency con-sultants who line their pockets handsomely first, well before the clients of the poor souls who go out of business (especially remembering back to the collapse Farepak, the Christmas Hamper Company. Oh, and Woolies as well, the liquidators shafted everyone on that one as well, didn't they?).

Yet Mr precise-job of Cheshunt, was offering, wait for it. £5 an hour. For a professional writer, Potentially two days work for £80, less the commission to the freelance web site (£72). So £36 a day for a professional, degree-educated writer!

And Mr precise-job of Cheshunt was deadly serious! I posted, as a clarification, in genuinely pleasant and pointy-out, inoffensive FYI language (I keep my offensive language solely for the dysfunctional HR industry), the official minimum wage details as copied and posted from the YouGov site;  I also added the recommended freelance writer rates from the link on the NUJ site.

His response. Rather than a "thank you for pointing this out", was a curt "well don't bid for the job then".

With slavery having been eradicated, I had no intention of bidding. So much for his self-congratulatory sentiments as a "leader in his field".

Yes, a leader of slave-driving, scroungers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will