Skip to main content

What have the Romans ever done for us?.......

That famous line - what have the Romans ever for us? - from the hilarious activists' (Reg and the lads) scene in the wonderfully funny "Life of Brian" film is concluded with:

"All right... all right... but apart from better sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public order... what have the Romans done for us?

And so it has been throughout history. People disaffected with their society form their own little groupings in protest, sometimes to just sit around and complain verbally, others to take a more direct action. Whether social, political, military or even terrorist. All have their own little agenda, some, far more legitimate than others, whether for a genuine cause in protest, simply as an easier route to making money than entering gainful employment, or to ultimately be awarded in the Queen’s Honours.

Some leave behind a legacy that enters the history books as a landmark - the ending of apartheid in South Africa, the Arab Spring, Gerry Adams shaking Ian Paisley’s hand or even the government acceding to lorry drivers’ protests and not increasing the price of diesel.

However, there is one group who, uniquely leave behind a legacy of total nothingness.

A group who have not developed anything of value, have won no accolades or awards for helping their people, have no famous scholars, scientists or inventors.

A group that has, in reality, contributed absolutely nothing whatsoever to the fabric of their or anyone else's society.

A barbaric group of sub-humans who know only how to murder and repress and have absolutely zero family values. Something, which, in the 21st Century, might be seen as rather bizarre.

This group takes pride in the fact that it shoots young schoolgirls who want to go to school. It threatens and then murders the children of men who are in the police force and refuse to leave. It enforces a ban on women studying at schools, universities or any other educational institution, cuts their fingers off if they are seen wearing nail polish, stones them to death as adultresses if they are are smelled by a man to be wearing perfume, and in fact, simply bans women from doing virtually anything in public or being seen to enjoy themselves, in essence relegating them to a housebound, meal-producing, housekeeping baby factory just there not to be seen and not to be heard.

The group also bans music, films, applause, Western forenames, the internet, kills converts from its religion, expects its people to pray five times a day, expects non-faith members to wear a badge (like the Nazis did to the Jews), its men must have long beards and must wear a turban at all times.

And so on. Ad nauseum.

And who are these wonderful people?

The Taliban.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...