Skip to main content

Recruitment Irony

It has always been said that to get a job you need experience, yet to gain experience you need a job.

However, thanks to the vagaries of recruitment and the almost universal dysfunctionality and haplessness of HR, this is only half the story.

Some companies are Degree-mad, their policy being that if you haven’t a University education, they won’t consider you for a job. Now, the thinking here is that if you can make it through college, you then equally have the nous to make it through their company ranks.

To some of these companies, it make no difference that while, yes, you have a degree, your abilities in literacy and numeracy not only leave a lot to be desired, but, for the actual purposes of the job, are virtually non-existent.

Yes, you may have a degree in metallurgy and a degree in animal husbandry, thereby giving you legal right to weld cats, but the fact you have a degree that has nothing to do with either the business itself or the department within that business you are working for, you fit right in as, for example, their marketing research manager. Because of your University education. In non-related subjects.

Subjects that have absolutely nothing to do with what you will be working at.

The other side of the coin is the insistence by many companies that you have “at least three years’ experience” in their sector.

The NHS is particularly notorious for this in terms of marketing recruitment. They are insistent on prior experience. So everyone lies on their CV, and the resultant best liar is hired. Providing they can get their CV in front of the correct one of the 11 recruitment agencies the NHS farms the recruitment process out to and who all advertise it as “my client”. This done at vast expense. And bear in mind there are already overpaid HR managers in place in the NHS that should be doing this job themselves, not paying others to do at vast public expense.

So is this the case with accountancy also?

Not being an accountant, I don’t know!

Is totting up figures, double entry systems and paying invoices not identical in every business? Or am I unaware of some special BACS process to pay a bill that is unique to the NHS?

Then why does the NHS insist on prior experience for marketing?

Writing a press release and sending it out to a journalist, or arranging an annual conference, is the same for every business. The contacts may be different, but the mechanics are exactly the same. And joining the NHS as a marketer would entail the same learning curve as a marketer new to the charity sector. Or to engineering.

I would love an explanation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...