Skip to main content

I love banks

The wild and wacky world of banking. I have been a "happy" customer of Halifax for some 20 years now. However, the nearest branch (local cherry, oak and chestnut trees excepted!) to me is either a 40-minute walk in one direction (no, not walking there surrounded by the five tah-ood X-Factor irritations!), or a bus journey in the other.

However, there is a Lloyds Bank, which owns Halifax, within five minutes' walk. So I phoned up my own bank to enquire if it would be possible to chuck some cash I'd received into my account via the Lloyds branch. "Yes" came the helpful reply, from a UK-based call centre operative, "it will be credited no later than within two hours". Fabulous, I thought.

Trotted off to Lloyds. But lo, they cannot accept cash (or cheques etc). I need a Lloyds debit card. I did my best to explain I was a Halifax customer and that Halifax is part of Lloyds. But to no avail. I suggested the use of a Bank Giro slip. Nada. The cashier said she would have to go into the back office to get a form and then it would take "up to 7 working days to verify my deposit". What is there to further verify about cash the cashier would have to count and check before accepting it from me anyway!

The helpful chappie on security and crowd control/directing overheard my plight and suggested I pop to the Post Office. Which I did. I paid in using my bank card. By the time I had left the Post Office, my phone pinged to tell me my bank account had received the money.

Methinks Lloyds have not heard of computers. It works for RBOS and NatWest, so why not for Lloyds and Halifax. I would love to know how they further "verify" cash they have to count on the spot, unless they send all the coinage back to the Royal Mint.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...