Skip to main content

The digital clock is causing the imminent fall of civilisation

 

It's life, but not as we know it Jim!

I knew the fall of civilisation was imminent back in 1995 when I was working as one of the 27 launch managers for the new, at the time, Vauxhall Vectra (or as the Director of Marketing insisted, "The new Vectra from Vauxhall". Bridge or borough he never did clarify). Driving one of the only 50 or so in existence to my designated 25 dealers one by one across the North East of England during the September of that year was a better buzz than if I'd been driving a Rolls Royce.

And then it was all shattered. Vauxhall gave Jeremy Clarkson a Vectra to road test. And the only thing he saw fit to mention was the "atomic" clock. The small, green four-figure display clock built into the car's dashboard that synced via, I think it was, General Motors' OnStar system, to the nearest available atomic clock, meaning that it was more accurate than something that was really accurate. And not only that, but for those willing to, they could sit in their car and watch the clock magically and automatically go back/forward itself on the dot of the GMT change at 2am in the morning twice a year.

However, the non-peasants were revolting. Rolls-Royce, not known for making rustbucket rattlers, had the gentrified classes swallowing their monocles from shock when they introduced a digital clock into their Phantom. So loud was the rattling of bottles of Bollinger in the ice bucket and the crash of falling shooting sticks as their customers fell over from shock and sheer weight of laundered money in their pockets, that Bayerische Motoren Werke AG relented and went back to an analogue version (driven by the car's electrics, so just digital without the digitalness).

Ironically, current battery analogue watches don't really differ from one another apart from name. Opening a wristwatch from one of the "high" fashion brands (not mentioning any names, but you know the type) to change the battery reveals almost the same Chinese innards as you find in a cheap thriftshop watch, alright, perhaps a little more refined (a nicely-honed battery compartment as opposed to one with a plastic nipple affair that snaps off when you replace the battery. But the electronics - the wound copper "thingy", the circuit board, well they're all the same. Maybe a bit more gold-plating in the more expensive watch, but that's about it. So whether you pay £550 or £4, you'll need a scientist to find the difference between the innards.

Despite all the digitisation and precise atomic timing, these fantastic timepieces still do not facilitate, for example, a family get together timed for 11am on a Sunday. Someone one arrives at 10:45 while the daughter inevitably arrives at 11:20. And a straggler at 11:45. Yes, all that digital power and prescience to the second, yet people, humans, cannot keep to the time on the readout.

Meanwhile, your dog trots along at 5pm each evening without prompting, fail or the ability to read the time, knowing it's their dinner time.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Season for all men

Well, we’re used to hearing about the Camping Season , which for Scouts runs from approximately 31st March to 31st October each year, although Graham Norton’s camping season lasts all year. Then there’s the Caravan Season , where Jeremy Clarkson spends six months with extremely high blood pressure as he tries to overtake them on the A38 in an excruciatingly expensive and completely unnecessary car. The Japanese have their Scientific Season, which was a series of sporadic weeks where they slaughtered endangered whales for scientific research, the results of which seem to be a closely guarded world-secret. This season now looks set, thanks to a group of spineless, land-locked countries threatened by the Land of the Rising Scientific Research with paying more for their Nintendos and PlayStations, to last until the final whale is wiped off the face of the oceans. I have written to the Japanese Embassy four times now seeking details of this research (email address info@l...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...

"Pre-" . . . . . good grief!!!!!!!!!

I was looking through the Guardian this morning and noticed a position being advertised that I thought I'd take a closer look at. The first sentence, when clicking the link to apply was: "If you are registered, please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you." What is the current fixation with the prefix "pre" . It is everywhere, turning perfectly reasonable statements into total and utter gibberish! I would have thought that for one of our major quality newspapers, instead of "please log in and we will pre-fill this form for you" it would have been much more sensible to have something along the lines of "please log in and your details will be automatically filled in for you". It is the rip-off Britain merchants who have embraced this particular prefix with a vengeance. They have nonsensically slapped it in front of the word " order " so that the moment an overpriced games console, war game for that console, phone,...