Skip to main content

Dysfunctional Layabouts Very Awkward - oh, er, the DVLA

Great to know the country's premium automated stealth-tax collection site doesn't do what it says on the front page.

Oh sorry, the recently new DVLA farce.

If you have a vehicle to shell out for, don't make any changes on-line, as you are then locked out for 5 working days (yep, weekends not included) while the system automatically (yep, "automatically" - you can tell its a civil service 'service', as it apparently realises when it's the weekend and doesn't work then) updates.

The DVLA themselves can't do anything for you, so you have to drag out to a Post Office (preferably one than hasn't been closed by this or the previous Government). Why the organ grinders have to send you to the moneys is beyond me!

Oh, and the highwaymen at DVLA will also charge you £2.50 to use a credit card.

And I love the message on the TOTALLY AUTOMATED PAYMENT phone system "all calls will be recorded for training and monitoring purposes" - I would love to know what they intend to do with a series of phone pad beeps.

What I can't get my head around is that while they had the chance, they should have simply got rid of car tax. Shoved a percentage on fuel so that those who use the most pay the most. A simple, self-financing pay as you drive system. Needs no administering, but then, the government lose chances to collect stealth taxes via their revenue camera cars.

But just think of how much time the Police would gain to chase criminals if they didn't have to go out on revenue duties!

If you must drive a 4x4 road digger and fuel burner to go to Sainsbury's, then you pay tax proportionally on the fuel you use. If you drive everywhere when you could just as easily walk or take public transport, then you pay more via your fuel. And if you don't like it, go electric.

And commercial travellers and professional drivers who use fuel as a tool of their trade could be easily accommodated through the tax system.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...