Skip to main content

English takes yet another hit, dumbing down this time thanks to "Adland"

Not content with having to continually suffer the transformation of English into our second language nationally by the cast of EastEnders, television presenters and other miscellaneous mispronouncers, the assault on grammatical correctness is now being spearheaded by the 'creative' advertising agencies who follow each other like sheep when a 'new' idea comes along. 

On the pronunciation front, we have been treated to actor Idris Elba and the £ 7 million Sky campaign where he trumpets "mumfs" (months) and Game of "Frones" (Thrones), amongst his other SAS-style attacks on the English language. 

The pressure is kept up by the likes of EastEnders, where they take "phoh-ohs" (photos), "faught" it was a "fret" ('thought' it was a 'threat'), have "free fings" ('three things') they need to do, use "twih-er" ('twitter') and have a "faahzand" ('thousand') people to see before "vey" ('they') run their "char-ih-ee marafans" ('charity marathons'). Before they all head off to Sonia's relations in "Keh-ehr-in" (Kettering). 

Appalling. 

Not to be outdone with Estuary English taking over TV, the advertising agencies throw their own hats into the ring with completely nonsensical and moronic straplines for brands that are meant to be amusing. However, they leave the majority of the public cold, especially when they are repeated ad nauseam for weeks on end. 

The first of these was the utterly meaningless campaign by mobile phone operator O2. They insist we "be more dog", which is about as intelligent - or possibly even less so - than a dog having its own campaign to "be more flea". This was followed by one of the 'independent' (ha ha - independent my foot) insurance comparison websites telling us that Fred (or Barney, or whoever it is) "is so Money Supermarket". Yes, in the same way, and as intellectual as saying Sir Richard Branson "is so aeroplane". Utterly and totally nonsensical. 

And then into the foray arrived Olay, the beauty products firm, and one of many in that industry known for advertising the wonderful ingredients they put in their product. This is all under the assumption that the average woman is a biochemist and actually knows what they are wittering on about. There's hyaluronic acid, amino-peptide complexes and pro-vitamin B5 (all backed up by 72% of the 58 women out of a population of some 35 million females who were asked, agreeing). 

However, in following those advertisers with their stupid, meaningless strap-lines, their creative agency - and do bear in mind that the agency is actually being paid for this - has come up with the astounding, ground-breaking, original and near death-defying statement "Your Best Beautiful". Now, how this is deemed as a suitable new entrant into the market to help part women from their money is beyond me. 

And not to be outdone, Jacobs has decided that their new crackers are more "lunchy". A noun conveniently turned into an adverb. Which presumably means my new bleach must be more "toilety". 

These are certainly as creative and winning as the runner-up in the British Boat Race, although compared to products we buy in the supermarket, at least in the case of the boat race, the boat's contents are worth considerably more than the boat.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...