Skip to main content

It's not our fault........

I never cease to be amazed at the Iranians.

Nothing is ever their fault. It's either the fault of the infidel West, Israel or the President of America.

But never their fault.

I could say as far as Iran is concerned, if it's anyone's fault, it's the French. They're the ones who, in the first place, sheltered, and then subsequently allowed out the barn-pot, two-shots short of a double vodka, warmongering 'cleric' Khomeini in the first place.

This man's only legacy (aside form the total destruction of cultural Iran as we knew it) was to introduce the Taliban, Boko Haram, Al Queda, 9/11 and all the other murderous misfits otherwise incapable of anything useful, to the world, and to turn the world against what had up to then been a respected world religion, previously attracting no derision, mistrust or disgust.

Khomeini allowed Iran to replace it's modern, cultural and intelligent, pro-Western despotic leadership with a bunch of out-of-date, out-of-tune and out-of-their-heads bearded lunatics who know only how to burn books, issue "fatwas", chop off hands, destroy culture and education, and worst of all, subjugate women.

The Iranian authorities, when they're not refining nuclear material to make into warheads, or providing new crayons for their peasant President's latest colouring book, have now decided, in their infinite wisdom, that the reason for so much divorce in the country is because of ...... wait for it ....... Turkish television soap operas.

Not because the male population have been encouraged by the maniac mullahs to denounce normality and regress to the 1600's and women are now becoming sick of it.

No.

It's the fault of the humble soap opera.

They really do defy belief!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...