Skip to main content

The classic signs of a recruitment consultant leading you up the garden path.......

Recruitment in the UK has become an ugly beast.

Companies are increasingly caught up in inefficient, amateur and downright unethical practices that are driven by HR nonsense imported from the USA. And unfortunately, successive governments haven't had the gumption to do something about it, where it has got to the stage that legislation is long overdue.

HR, often called "Human Remains" by increasingly cynical and mistrusting staff, has now become the laughing stock of business practices, often the crutch used by limping CEO's and MD's who are too weak to either do the hiring and firing themselves, or do anything constructive about it.

Now I don't for one minute deny that there are some good personnel people out there! Unfortunately, they are overshadowed by the clinically useless and mechanically inept - those who make more noise, create more misery and frankly, exist for no other reason than they have a little more knowledge on the subject than their peers.

There are some classic signs in recruitment advertising, mainly at the keyboards of some professionally useless recruitment consultants (again, there are some good ones out there), that the candidate is 'being had'. Here are some of them:

"My Client is the UK leader in their field" - yep, the classic opener to any faux recruitment advertisement. Such a leader that they don't divulge who they are. In other words, they (the unfortunate recruiter) have forgotten the "No agencies please" at the bottom of their original advertisement and have left themselves open to a barrage of offers from recruitment consultants that wear them down.

“Recognised name and an employer of choice” – oh wow. Yes. An employer of choice. This is THE classic sales pitch to accompany "my client" and the "leading" nonsense that has drawn you in. They are certainly  the “employer of choice” until you cross swords with their useless HR department over your less than “employer of choice” and "leading" salary and conditions.

"Multi-million £ turnover" - yet they are offering either a non-committal "attractive salary", or one that is so low as to be offensive. Or they even ask candidates their own salary expectations.

"We will only contact you within the next 'x' days if you are selected for interview." - as we are working speculatively, we simply can't be arsed wasting the time and effort to acknowledge that you actually exist. Besides, we already have hundreds of poor saps on the books who have  previously applied for similar advertisements we placed over the past few months, so that's much easier and less expensive for us if we give them a shout first.

"Please be aware we receive a high volume of applications for every role advertised and  regularly receive applications from candidates who exceed the job credentials." We have created this situation where talented people are desperate for a job, but thanks to recruitment consultants like us, it's carnage out there on the job front. Besides, we use automatic CV scanning software, so if you haven't all the hit words in your CV, you're wasting your time - do you actually believe we waste our own time reading the CV you spent hours putting together?

"It may be advantageous for you to tailor your CV". Well, seeing as we haven't a foggy clue what you do, or for that matter what "My Client" does, just make our job easier. Please. We work hard for the 25% commission we charge "My Client". Yes, I know, they could save the commission and increase the salary on offer by 20% but then I might have to sell my BMW. Or my penis-extension personalised numberplate.

"Plus benefits". At least we think there might be some benefits. We'll get back to you on that. If we can be bothered.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Win a Million" free scratch card newspaper inserts

One of those three-panel "Win a Million" scratchcards fell out of my newspaper this morning. Not a major or in anyway newsworthy event in itself, but I must admit my surprise. I didn't think anyone bothered with them anymore, or, to be a little more technical, I didn't think anyone was taken in by them anymore. Firstly, it actually is printed on the bottom of each panel that "Every card has a set of 3 matching symbols, 2 matching symbols and no matching symbols". Right, so you are going to 'win', half-win and not win respectively. Then, while the prize list is somewhat impressive with 1x£1m, 1x£100k, 2x£20k, 3x£10k and other things like holidays, tablet PC's city breaks all the way down to 1000 "faux" fashion watches, 1000 salon  makeovers and 1000xVIP Thames cruises. Now should I be stupid enough to spend the £1.53 a minute for the 6 minute phone call to claim my prize (that's almost a tenner, for those of you without cal...

Chancellor's letter of apology to Bob Diamond of Barclays

Thanks to my contacts at the new News International business "Phonetaps'R'Us", I was exclusively sent a copy of a letter sent to the Chief Executive of Barclays Bank, Bob Diamond, from the Chancellor yesterday. "Dear Bob Trusting you and yours are well. Listen mate. Sorry the F inancially S tupid A sses wrote to your bank yesterday to demand £290million as a fine. It's nothing personal, and just because your bank head office people are a bunch of dishonest, thieving bastards, I thought there was no reason to carry on that way and fine you. I made this clear to the FSA yesterday as soon as I heard the news. I told them that the taxpayer would have been more than happy to bail you out. And also. Look mate. Sorry you've had to give up your bonus this year. It must have come as quite a shock, and was a wonderful thing for you to volunteer to do. I only hope you've put something by from the £17million you received last year. No doubt the bank pay...

"Q". My name is Bond. Oh. not THAT Q.

I was sent a story today by a friend who knows my feelings on the subject - that is, about one of the consummately greatest of all British activities, namely, queuing. It seems some Danish Professor or other has come up with the theory that those who queue the longest should actually be served the last. He claims it makes purchasing something altogether more efficient and smooth through the idea of 'contra-queuing' (whatever the devil that may mean). 'Serve the people at the back of the queue first', he says, with profound wisdom. Altogether very professorial, albeit demonstrating a somewhat keen lack of understanding of the purchasing psyche. The Nobel Prize-chasing Prof suggests that if, for example, a popular entertainment act was to announce a tour, with tickets going on sale at 11am one morning, using the theory of 'contra-queuing', no one will want to be first to buy said tickets. So no one will turn up 14 months in advance and venues will...